Courtesy of Arlene Goldbard (h/t Artssake, btw, thanks for calling me "delicious"!). In the post she talks about some things artists could be paid to do under a new WPA style employment program and more. Here's her list:
- teach
- co-create plays and murals with people young and old
- run community darkrooms and workshops
- beautify the built environment
- carve out space for people to dream, invent and communicate about things that matter to themselves and their communities
- assist communities in creating archives of digital stories
- create public art that commemorates generative moments in the history of a community
- devise choral works and pageants, installations and exhibitions, dances and poetry journals that express and embody community identity and aspiration
- create workplace programs that engage workers in participatory management
- facilitate processes that help people dream their way into new approaches to community and economic development….
I will note one thing and ask one question. First, the thing... Obama's arts policy specifically calls for the creation of an Artists Corps:
Barack Obama supports the creation of an “Artists Corps” of young artists trained to work in low-income schools and their communities. Studies in Chicago have demonstrated that test scores improved faster for students enrolled in low-income schools that link arts across the curriculum than scores for students in schools lacking such programs.
And now to ask the question.... this one is for people who do not make their living from making art, so you full-time artists out there just simmer down for a moment...
Comments