Did you ever notice how physical our language for
interaction is? Make a connection. Make contact. Finding something touching.
Is this language obsolete in the
digital age? Two of the more
profound conversations I’ve had over the last week were done over G-chat. Is it possible to find something
touching when there is no chance the person you’re interacting with can
actually touch you? To be clear,
I’m not slagging G-Chat or Twitter or any of it, I actually find that’s enabled
me to… oh what’s the word… keep in touch
with people much easier.
In Infinite Jest’s speculative (and somewhat satirical) future, over
95% of all entertainment is consumed in the home, beamed into our television
sets. No one goes to movie theaters and there is no network television
(Everything’s a la carte pay per view). As a result, random live
events—muggings, the draining of a duck pond, five alarm fires—are huge
gatherings of people. They’re
called SpecOps (Spectator Opportunities). We’re so alienated in his future, so
used to private consumption of the staged, that we crave live experience of the
spontaneous.
There is no hiding in
theatre. Over Gchat, you can fake
an emotion you’re not having (or- even worse- pretend not to feel when you in fact do). When you watch a film as an audience member, you are
protected from the performer (and they by you). Furthermore, editing allows film actors to hide constantly.
When your scene partner is doing “coverage” you don’t have to be “there” in any
real sense.
This
is one of the many reasons that theatre is a hard thing for actors to do. And
why it’s hard for audiences as well.
Your collective energy can’t be hid from the performers, and you can
never stop touching and being touched when you’re on stage. I wonder if, as our connections to
people get more and more virtual, our craving for live experience will get
greater or diminish.
Recent Comments